Hidden Gap #2: The Portfolio Mistake Costing You Revenue

When “Prospects” Aren’t Really Prospects
Are you and your team frustrated with donor prospects who seem to consume time without ever moving toward a gift?
You know the type. They enjoy the invitations. They want to be included. They ask thoughtful questions and show up at events. But when the conversation shifts toward commitment and investment, momentum stalls.
It can be confusing. It can be exhausting.
Here is the question that often changes the entire conversation.
Are these individuals truly major gift prospects?
Or are they suspects?
Receive expert advice. Direct to your inbox. Subscribe
These two terms are frequently used interchangeably. They should not be. The distinction between suspects and major gift prospects has real implications for your strategy and your results.
Suspects vs. Major Gift Prospects
A suspect is someone who might give at a higher level. There may be interest. There may be early engagement. There may even be wealth indicators.
But a major gift prospect is different.
A true major gift prospect has verified capacity, meaningful alignment with your mission, and a demonstrated willingness to engage in serious conversations about impact and investment.
That combination matters.
When organizations blur the line between suspects and major gift prospects, portfolios expand beyond what is strategic. Time is divided evenly rather than intentionally. High-capacity donors do not receive the preparation and attention required for transformational gifts.
This is not about being exclusive.
Find out how we can help you achieve your fundraising goals with world-class consulting and custom training.
It is about being disciplined.
Why Portfolios Quietly Inflate
Many major gift officers carry portfolios of 120, 150, sometimes even more. On paper, that can look productive. In reality, it often leads to shallow engagement across too many names.
There are understandable reasons this happens. Leadership may equate a larger portfolio with productivity. Boards may hesitate to remove long-time supporters. Fundraisers may hold onto promising relationships in the hope of securing a donation.
But hope is not a major gift strategy.
Major gift revenue is concentrated. A relatively small percentage of donors will drive the majority of results. If your major gift prospects are not clearly defined and prioritized, your effort becomes diluted.
Diluted focus rarely produces sustained growth.
The Cost of Chasing Suspects
Chasing suspects does more than consume time. It prevents depth.
Depth is what moves a relationship from friendly supporter to invested partner. It requires preparation, intentional follow-up, and multiple meaningful conversations. It requires knowing why this donor belongs in your portfolio and what shared vision you are building toward together.
When your calendar is filled with meetings that do not have a clear path forward, your strongest major gift prospects inevitably receive less attention than they deserve.
Over time, that shows up in unpredictable revenue, slower momentum, and increasing frustration across the team.
This is not a talent issue.
It is a focus issue.
What Changes When You Clarify
When organizations clearly define major gift prospects and separate suspects into distinct cultivation pathways, something steadier begins to emerge.
Portfolios become manageable. Conversations become more strategic. Forecasting becomes more realistic. Fundraisers walk into donor meetings with greater confidence because they understand the larger plan.
This distinction between suspects and prospects is one of the most practical conversations we have inside the Major Gifts Intensive. It becomes a helpful educational tool for executive teams and boards. Once everyone understands the criteria, expectations shift. Pressure decreases. Results improve.
A Simple Test
Review your portfolio honestly.
Which names have verified capacity, clear alignment, and demonstrated engagement?
Which names are there because they feel promising?
If you removed the maybe someday relationships, what would remain?
That is the beginning of strategic focus.
The Bottom Line
If your major gift portfolio is filled with suspects, your strongest major gift prospects are not receiving your best thinking, preparation, or time.
That has consequences for revenue, morale, forecasting, and confidence.
The solution is not adding more names. It is building a disciplined system that helps you identify true major gift prospects, structure your portfolio around them, and move relationships forward with intention.
That is exactly what we do inside the 2026 Major Gifts Intensive.
Over twelve weeks, you will define clear criteria for major gift prospects, rebuild your portfolio around capacity and alignment, create revenue targets tied to real opportunity, practice strategic conversations that move donors toward commitment, and align leadership and board expectations with a focused plan.
Participants apply the work in real time. Many organizations see measurable progress during the program because they are implementing while they learn.
If you recognize this hidden gap in your own portfolio, this may be the moment to address it directly.
Or schedule a complimentary conversation to explore whether the Major Gifts Intensive is right for you or your team.
Major gift growth begins with clarity about who truly belongs in your portfolio.


